Coca Cola Co (KO) stock price, news and key stats

StockConsumer Staples

Price

$87.87-0.84 (-0.95%)

Last close as of Sep 16, 2026. Delayed data; not a live quote.

Previous close
$88.71
Open
$88.48
Day range
$87.74 – $88.66
Volume
17.1M

About Coca Cola Co

Coca-Cola Company is a beverage corporation, primarily exposed to soft drink production and distribution.

Latest KO news

  • Not all tech is under fire in Monday's selling, while investors seek refuge in defensive stocks
    CNBC · Sep 14, 2026

    On Monday, the stock market experienced a broad sell-off, yet not all sectors faced the same level of scrutiny. While high-growth technology stocks were notably affected, certain segments within the tech industry showed resilience, particularly those linked to essential services and cybersecurity. This divergence highlights a growing trend where investors are increasingly selective, favoring companies that provide stability and consistent revenue streams amid economic uncertainty. As investors sought refuge from the volatility, defensive stocks, including utilities and consumer staples, gained traction. These sectors are typically viewed as safe havens during turbulent market conditions, as they tend to maintain steady demand regardless of economic fluctuations. The shift towards defensive investments suggests a cautious sentiment among market participants, who are bracing for potential headwinds from rising interest rates and inflationary pressures. The mixed performance within the tech sector and the pivot to defensive stocks may indicate a broader recalibration of investor strategies. As market dynamics evolve, those companies that can demonstrate resilience and adaptability are likely to attract more attention, potentially leading to a bifurcated market where growth and value stocks coexist but perform distinctly based on prevailing economic conditions.

  • ‘We will always stand with the underdog’: The UK defends ban on Israeli ‘settler terrorist’ trade from the West Bank
    Fortune · Sep 9, 2026

    The UK government has reaffirmed its commitment to a ban on trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank, labeling such entities as "settler terrorists." This stance is part of a broader strategy to support Palestinian rights and uphold international law, reflecting a growing trend among Western nations to scrutinize trade practices linked to disputed territories. The UK's position may influence other countries to adopt similar measures, potentially reshaping trade dynamics in the region. Market implications of this ban could be significant, particularly for companies involved in agricultural exports and other goods produced in the West Bank settlements. Investors may need to reassess their exposure to firms that rely on these markets, as the UK’s stance could lead to increased regulatory scrutiny and potential boycotts. Additionally, the move may heighten tensions in the Middle East, impacting regional stability and investor sentiment in related sectors, such as energy and defense. As global markets react to geopolitical developments, the UK's decision underscores the intersection of trade policy and human rights considerations in international relations.

  • US affordability tracker: the data that could decide the 2026 midterm elections
    FT Global Economy · Sep 9, 2026

    The Financial Times has launched an Affordability Tracker that will monitor price fluctuations for essential goods such as groceries, gasoline, electricity, and housing across the United States, with a particular focus on battleground states. This initiative comes at a critical time as elevated prices for energy and basic necessities are influencing voter sentiment ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Candidates are increasingly prioritizing consumer affordability, which could reshape campaign strategies and voter turnout. Recent polling indicates that Democrats are gaining momentum in key races, including the Senate and gubernatorial contests in traditionally Republican strongholds like Texas. As affordability becomes a central issue, candidates may pivot their messaging to address economic concerns rather than environmental policies, potentially swaying undecided voters. The implications for Congress are significant, as control of the House and Senate hangs in the balance, and the affordability narrative could play a pivotal role in determining electoral outcomes. With the Affordability Tracker providing real-time data, candidates and parties will be better equipped to respond to constituents' economic anxieties, making it a crucial tool in shaping campaign strategies as the election approaches.

  • Saudi Central Bank Boosts Stock Position in CocaCola Company (The) $KO
    Central Banks · Sep 6, 2026

    The Saudi Central Bank has increased its stake in The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE: KO), a move that underscores the bank's confidence in the beverage giant's long-term growth potential. The central bank's acquisition comes amid a broader strategy to diversify its investment portfolio, particularly in stable, high-performing companies that offer consistent returns. This decision reflects a growing trend among sovereign wealth funds and central banks to invest in established multinational corporations as a hedge against economic volatility. Market analysts view this development as a positive signal for Coca-Cola, which has been navigating challenges such as shifting consumer preferences and supply chain disruptions. The increased investment from a major financial institution like the Saudi Central Bank could bolster investor sentiment around the stock, potentially leading to increased demand and a rise in share prices. Furthermore, this move may encourage other institutional investors to reassess their positions in Coca-Cola, contributing to a more favorable market outlook for the company in the coming quarters.

  • Coca-Cola Stock at $88: Here's Why Investors Should Pause
    Yahoo Finance · Sep 5, 2026

    Coca-Cola's stock has reached $88, prompting investors to reconsider their positions as market dynamics shift. Despite the company's impressive track record of extending its dividend for over 60 years, concerns are mounting regarding its elevated price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 27, which significantly outpaces rival PepsiCo's more attractive P/E of 19. This disparity raises questions about the sustainability of Coca-Cola's valuation, particularly as investors weigh the potential for better returns elsewhere. Moreover, PepsiCo's higher dividend yield of 4% compared to Coca-Cola's tighter payout ratio suggests that income-focused investors may find more appealing opportunities in its competitor. The asset-light nature of Coca-Cola's business model, while historically advantageous, may not justify the current premium investors are paying for its stock. As market conditions evolve, the relative performance of these two beverage giants could lead to a reevaluation of Coca-Cola's attractiveness, especially given its recent outperformance against rivals and the broader market. In light of these factors, investors may want to pause before committing further capital to Coca-Cola. The stock's current valuation, combined with the competitive landscape and the allure of better dividend yields from peers like PepsiCo, suggests that caution may be warranted in the near term.

  • If a Downturn Is Coming, 50 Years of Market History Says This Is the Single Best Response
    Yahoo Finance · Sep 5, 2026

    As concerns about a potential economic downturn grow, historical market trends suggest that investors may benefit from adopting a defensive strategy. According to analysis of the past 50 years of market behavior, maintaining a diversified portfolio that includes defensive stocks—such as those in consumer staples, utilities, and healthcare—can provide a buffer against market volatility. These sectors tend to perform better during economic slowdowns, as their products and services remain in demand regardless of the economic climate. Furthermore, the historical data indicates that investors who remain calm and avoid panic selling during downturns often recover more quickly when the market rebounds. This approach aligns with the adage attributed to Winnie the Pooh, emphasizing the importance of patience and strategic thinking in times of uncertainty. As the market braces for potential headwinds, focusing on long-term investment goals rather than short-term fluctuations may be the most prudent course of action for investors seeking to weather the storm. In light of these insights, market participants are advised to reassess their portfolios and consider reallocating assets towards more resilient sectors. This strategy not only mitigates risk but also positions investors to capitalize on opportunities when the market eventually stabilizes.

  • Food Exec Brief: Natural Color Supply Can't Meet 2027 Deadlines, Tariff Inflation Has Arrived, and Consumer Trust in Food Safety Slides
    Macro Watch · Sep 4, 2026

    The food industry is facing significant challenges as the supply of natural colors is projected to fall short of demand by 2027, raising concerns about product formulation and market stability. This shortfall could lead to increased prices for food manufacturers who rely on these ingredients, potentially passing costs onto consumers and impacting overall market dynamics. As companies scramble to secure alternative sources or innovate with synthetic options, the implications for product labeling and consumer perception could be profound. Adding to the industry's woes, tariff inflation has reached 3.3% in the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index, further straining profit margins for food producers. This increase in costs is likely to affect pricing strategies across the sector, as companies may be forced to adjust their pricing to maintain profitability. The combination of rising ingredient costs and tariffs could lead to higher prices at the grocery store, which may dampen consumer spending in other areas. Compounding these issues, a recent survey indicates that 67% of consumers are now avoiding entire food categories following product recalls, reflecting a significant decline in trust regarding food safety. This erosion of consumer confidence could have lasting effects on brand loyalty and purchasing behavior, prompting companies to invest more in transparency and safety measures. As the food industry navigates these multifaceted challenges, the interplay between supply constraints, inflationary pressures, and consumer trust will be critical in shaping its future trajectory.

  • Diesel’s record $5.85 per gallon price threatens higher grocery bills, with refrigerated foods among the first to feel the squeeze
    Fortune · Sep 4, 2026

    Diesel prices in the United States have surged to an unprecedented average of $5.85 per gallon, a significant increase driven by ongoing fuel disruptions linked to the six-month conflict in Iran. This spike in diesel costs is poised to have far-reaching implications for various sectors, particularly in logistics and food supply chains. As diesel fuels the transportation of goods, including essential items like groceries, businesses are bracing for increased operational costs that are likely to be passed on to consumers. The immediate impact of rising diesel prices is expected to be felt most acutely in the refrigerated food sector, where transportation costs are critical to maintaining product quality and safety. With commercial trucks and trains facing higher fuel expenses, grocery bills are anticipated to rise as retailers adjust their pricing strategies to offset these costs. Analysts warn that this could exacerbate inflationary pressures already affecting consumers, particularly in low-income households that spend a larger portion of their budgets on food. As the situation unfolds, market participants will be closely monitoring fuel price trends and their ripple effects across the economy. The potential for sustained high diesel prices could lead to broader inflationary trends, prompting policymakers to consider interventions to stabilize fuel markets and mitigate the impact on consumers.

  • Top 3 Risk Off Stocks That May Implode This quarter
    Risk & Volatility · Sep 4, 2026

    As of September 4, 2026, three stocks in the consumer staples sector are raising alarms for investors focused on momentum trading. These stocks, identified as potentially vulnerable this quarter, exhibit concerning Relative Strength Index (RSI) levels, indicating they may be oversold and could face significant downward pressure. The consumer staples sector, typically viewed as a safe haven during market volatility, may not provide the expected stability for these particular stocks. The implications for investors are twofold. On one hand, the oversold status may present a buying opportunity for those looking to capitalize on undervalued companies. However, the risk of further declines looms large, particularly if broader economic conditions worsen or if consumer spending continues to falter. Investors should tread carefully, as the momentum indicators suggest that these stocks may not only be underperforming but could also be on the brink of a more severe downturn. Market participants should closely monitor these stocks as the quarter progresses, keeping an eye on earnings reports and economic indicators that could influence consumer behavior. The potential for an implosion in these stocks could not only affect individual portfolios but also signal broader trends within the consumer staples sector, prompting a reevaluation of investment strategies across the board.

  • The Only Winners from Trump’s Tariffs Are Big Corporations - Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy
    Macro Watch · Sep 3, 2026

    A recent report from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy highlights that the primary beneficiaries of former President Donald Trump's tariffs are large corporations, rather than the American workers or consumers that were initially promised relief. The analysis indicates that these tariffs, aimed at protecting domestic industries, have disproportionately favored big businesses that can absorb increased costs and pass them on to consumers, rather than fostering the growth of small and medium-sized enterprises. The findings suggest that while tariffs were intended to bolster American manufacturing and create jobs, they have instead led to higher prices for consumers and limited competition. Big corporations, with their substantial resources, have managed to navigate the tariff landscape more effectively, often using their market power to maintain profit margins. This has raised concerns about the long-term implications for market dynamics, as smaller companies struggle to compete in an environment where costs are artificially inflated. Market analysts are now closely watching how these dynamics will evolve, particularly as inflationary pressures continue to affect consumer spending. The report underscores the need for a reassessment of trade policies to ensure they serve the broader economy rather than just the interests of large corporations. As the Biden administration considers its own trade strategies, the findings may influence future decisions regarding tariffs and trade agreements, potentially shifting the focus back toward supporting smaller businesses and fostering a more equitable economic environment.

All 39 articles in the app →

Index membership

Chart, AI research and agents for KO

Open KO in Watchgar for the live chart, AI-graded news, insider and institutional flow, and automated trading agents. Free to start, no card required.

Open KO in Watchgar